Britain’s most polarising Palestinian solidarity movement has sparked unprecedented government action. Palestine Action, a direct-action network founded in 2020, now faces terrorism charges that have divided the nation. The group’s bold tactics targeting arms manufacturers have led to mass arrests and international condemnation of UK policy.
The Birth of a Movement
Palestine Action emerged during the height of global awareness about Palestinian rights. The British pro-Palestinian network set ambitious goals from its inception. Founders aimed to dismantle what they describe as British complicity in Israeli military operations. Their mission statement demands an end to global participation in what they term “genocidal and apartheid regime” activities.
The organisation quickly gained attention through targeted protests. Early campaigns focused on British factories owned by Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit Systems. These actions represented a strategic shift from traditional protest methods to direct intervention tactics.
Direct Action Strategy
Palestine Action adopted confrontational approaches that distinguish them from conventional activist groups. Members have occupied premises, destroyed property, and vandalised facilities they consider complicit in arms manufacturing. These tactics deliberately court arrest and media attention to highlight their cause.
The group’s methodology reflects influence from historical direct-action movements. Protesters often film their activities, creating powerful social media content that amplifies their message. This digital-first approach has helped recruit supporters across Britain and internationally.
The RAF Brize Norton Incident
Everything changed on 20 June 2025 when Palestine Action members breached RAF Brize Norton. Activists sprayed red paint on two RAF aircraft in a dramatic security breach. The incident triggered immediate government response and accelerated proscription proceedings.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced the government’s intention to ban the group just three days later. This rapid escalation marked a significant shift in how authorities handle domestic protest movements. The RAF incident provided the catalyst government officials needed to pursue terrorism legislation.
Security Implications
The Brize Norton breach exposed vulnerabilities in Britain’s military infrastructure. Government sources described the incident as unacceptable interference with national security assets. Defence officials launched comprehensive reviews of base security following the attack.
Critics argued that the breach demonstrated excessive government reliance on private security contractors. The incident raised questions about whether current measures adequately protect sensitive military installations from determined activists.
Government Proscription Process
The UK Parliament faced an unusual bundling strategy when considering Palestine Action’s terrorist designation. Government officials packaged Palestine Action alongside two neo-Nazi groups in a single proscription order. This controversial approach forced MPs to approve all three organisations together or reject them collectively.
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb described the bundling tactic as “sneaky” during House of Lords debates. Multiple MPs criticised the approach for creating artificial pressure to support proscription. The strategy effectively prevented parliamentarians from examining each organisation’s merits individually.
On 2 July 2025, the House of Commons voted 385 to 26 in favour of proscription. The House of Lords followed suit the following day. The Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025 came into force on 5 July.
Legal Challenges Begin
Palestine Action co-founder Huda Ammori immediately challenged the proscription through legal channels. The Administrative Court and Court of Appeal initially rejected interim relief applications. However, judges granted permission for a comprehensive legal challenge examining potential human rights violations.
The case will test whether the proscription violates Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Legal experts suggest the outcome could reshape how governments respond to direct-action movements across Europe.
Mass Arrest Campaigns
Since the ban took effect, British police have arrested over 2,000 Palestine Action supporters. These unprecedented numbers reflect the scale of civil disobedience following proscription. Protest organisers through the group Defend Our Juries have coordinated nationwide demonstrations.
The largest single-day arrest occurred on 9 August 2025 in Parliament Square. Metropolitan Police detained 466 people in what became the force’s biggest operation in a decade. Among those arrested was former Guantanamo Bay detainee Moazzam Begg, highlighting the diverse coalition supporting Palestine Action.
Elderly Protesters Face Charges
Arrest demographics reveal surprising patterns about Palestine Action’s support base. Police data shows the average age of arrested protesters is 54 years. More than 112 detainees were over 70 years old during the Parliament Square demonstration.
This demographic profile challenges stereotypes about radical activism. Solicitor Katie McFadden, representing many arrested protesters, described police officers’ discomfort with treating elderly citizens as suspected terrorists. Officers appeared “shocked and horrified” at having to arrest senior citizens for peaceful expression.
October Trafalgar Square Protests
Recent protests in Trafalgar Square demonstrated continued defiance despite legal risks. On 5 October 2025, nearly 500 people were arrested during a demonstration supporting Palestine Action. The protest proceeded despite government and police requests to cancel following the Manchester synagogue attack.
Demonstrators held signs reading “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action” before being detained. Among those arrested was an 89-year-old protester, highlighting the movement’s intergenerational appeal. Jewish activists, including a 79-year-old Holocaust survivor’s daughter, also faced arrest for supporting the cause.
International Condemnation
United Nations human rights chief Volker Türk urged Britain to lift the Palestine Action ban. The UN official described the proscription as a “disturbing” misuse of counter-terrorism legislation. International observers characterised the ban as “disproportionate and unnecessary” given the group’s non-violent methods.
Amnesty International expressed “deep concern” about mass arrests following protests. Civil liberties organisations across Europe have criticised Britain’s approach as conflating legitimate protest with terrorism. These criticisms have intensified diplomatic pressure on the UK government to reconsider its position.
Cultural Figures Speak Out
Prominent British cultural figures have also condemned the proscription. Award-winning novelist Sally Rooney publicly pledged to fund Palestine Action, prompting government warnings about supporting proscribed organisations. The Prime Minister’s office reminded supporters that funding banned groups constitutes a criminal offence.
Hundreds of lawyers signed letters opposing the ban as an attack on civil liberties. Legal professionals argued that the proscription sets dangerous precedents for criminalising dissent. These professional interventions reflect broader concerns about Britain’s democratic traditions.
Government Response and New Powers
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has defended the government’s approach while calling for calm. Following recent protests, Starmer urged demonstrators to “respect the grief of British Jews” after the Manchester synagogue attack. The Prime Minister positioned the protests as inappropriate timing given community tensions.
The Home Office announced plans to grant police enhanced powers to combat repeated protests. These new measures represent significant expansion of law enforcement capabilities against persistent demonstration campaigns. Officials justified the powers as necessary responses to resource-draining protest tactics.
Police Resource Concerns
Metropolitan Police commanders have complained about protest-related resource demands. Senior officers argue that Palestine Action demonstrations divert personnel from community protection duties. The force highlighted this concern following the Manchester synagogue attack when enhanced security was needed.
Critics counter that policing peaceful protests shouldn’t strain resources if conducted proportionately. They argue that mass arrests create unnecessary workload compared to allowing lawful expression. This debate reflects broader questions about protest policing strategies in modern Britain.
For more UK football culture and fan insights, explore these related reads:
The Palestine Action controversy intersects with broader cultural discussions about British identity and international solidarity. Football standings often reflect similar passionate support for causes that resonate with local communities. Sports culture and political activism share common ground in mobilising collective action. The passion seen in Chelsea lineup discussions mirrors the dedication Palestine Action supporters demonstrate. International sporting connections, like those between Bulgaria FC and British clubs, parallel the global solidarity networks supporting Palestinian rights. Even FC Copenhagen fixtures attract attention that reflects how international awareness shapes local perspectives. Similar community engagement appears in FC Cincinnati standings discussions among diaspora communities in Britain.
The Defend Our Juries Campaign
Defend Our Juries, formed by former government lawyer Tim Crosland, leads the campaign against Palestine Action’s proscription. The organisation emerged from concerns about legal system undermining regarding conscience rights. Their “Lift the Ban” campaign coordinates nationwide civil disobedience efforts.
The group plans escalated actions throughout November 2025 leading to judicial review hearings. Organisers anticipate thousands participating in coordinated protests across Britain. The campaign represents the largest sustained challenge to terrorism legislation in recent British history.
November 2025 Escalation Plans
Campaign coordinators have announced plans for intensive November actions. From 18-28 November, supporters will conduct protests in key cities leading to the judicial review. London will serve as the focal point for convergence during court hearings.
Organisers acknowledge significant arrest risks while providing legal briefings for participants. The campaign’s scale suggests determination to challenge the proscription through sustained pressure. Success could establish important precedents for protest rights in Britain.
Public Opinion and Media Coverage
British media coverage has reflected deep divisions about Palestine Action’s methods and government response. Traditional outlets have generally supported the proscription while highlighting civil liberties concerns. Social media platforms show more polarised reactions reflecting broader societal splits.
The movement has generated substantial sympathy among certain demographics. Polls suggest younger Britons are more supportive of direct action tactics than older generations. However, the elderly protester demographic challenges these assumptions about generational divides.
Impact on Palestinian Solidarity
The proscription has energised Palestinian solidarity movements across Britain. Traditional advocacy groups have distanced themselves from Palestine Action while supporting their right to peaceful expression. This nuanced position reflects complex dynamics within solidarity communities.
Some observers argue that the ban has actually amplified Palestine Action’s message. Media attention surrounding arrests has increased awareness about British arms sales to Israel. The Streisand effect appears to be operating despite government intentions to silence the movement.
Economic and Political Implications
Palestine Action’s targeting of arms manufacturers has highlighted Britain’s defence industry connections. The group’s focus on Elbit Systems facilities has drawn attention to UK-Israel military cooperation. Government response suggests these economic relationships influence policy decisions.
The proscription debate occurs alongside broader discussions about British foreign policy. Labour’s position on Palestinian rights has evolved since taking office. The Palestine Action controversy tests the party’s commitment to civil liberties principles.
Impact on UK-Israel Relations
Britain’s strong response to Palestine Action signals continued support for Israeli security concerns. The proscription aligns with Israeli government requests to curtail BDS movement activities. This coordination reflects deep diplomatic relationships despite occasional policy disagreements.
However, the international criticism of the ban may complicate Britain’s Middle East diplomacy. EU partners have questioned the proportionality of terrorism legislation against protest movements. These tensions could affect broader regional policy coordination.
Future Prospects
The judicial review scheduled for November 2025 represents a crucial test for both sides. Palestine Action’s legal team argues the proscription violates fundamental rights to assembly and expression. Government lawyers will defend the ban as necessary counter-terrorism measures.
The case outcome could reshape British protest law for decades. A successful challenge might establish stronger protections for direct-action movements. Conversely, upholding the proscription could encourage similar bans against other activist groups.
International Ramifications
Other European governments are closely monitoring the British approach. Success in suppressing Palestine Action through terrorism laws could inspire similar measures elsewhere. This precedent effect worries civil liberties advocates across the continent.
Conversely, international criticism and legal challenges might discourage other nations from following Britain’s lead. The UN condemnation carries significant diplomatic weight in international forums. Britain’s soft power could suffer if the approach appears disproportionate to international observers.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Palestine Action and when was it founded?
Palestine Action is a British pro-Palestinian direct action network founded in 2020. The organisation aims to end global participation in what it describes as Israel’s “genocidal and apartheid regime”. The group focuses on targeting British arms manufacturers and military installations through direct action protests.
Why was Palestine Action banned by the UK government?
The UK government proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation on 5 July 2025 following a security breach at RAF Brize Norton. Members of the group sprayed red paint on RAF aircraft on 20 June 2025, prompting the government to use terrorism legislation against the organisation. The ban was approved by Parliament despite criticism from civil liberties groups.
How many people have been arrested for supporting Palestine Action?
Since the proscription took effect, British police have arrested over 2,000 people for supporting Palestine Action. The largest single-day arrest occurred on 9 August 2025, when 466 people were detained in Parliament Square. Recent protests in October 2025 resulted in nearly 500 additional arrests.
What is Defend Our Juries and their role in the campaign?
Defend Our Juries is a UK activist group formed in 2020 by former government lawyer Tim Crosland. The organisation leads the “Lift the Ban” campaign against Palestine Action’s proscription. They coordinate nationwide protests and civil disobedience efforts to challenge the terrorism designation.
What are the international reactions to the Palestine Action ban?
United Nations human rights chief Volker Türk condemned the ban as a “disturbing” misuse of counter-terrorism legislation. Amnesty International expressed “deep concern” about mass arrests following the proscription. Civil liberties organisations across Europe have criticised Britain’s approach as conflating legitimate protest with terrorism.
To Read More- Liverpooldaily
Leave a Reply